Case Files

Five engagements. Five different problems.

Representative work with figures sanitized — an acquisition, a development, a net-lease hold, a hospitality reposition, and a model rescue. The depth shown here is the depth you receive.

Case Files

Five engagements, five different problems.

Client work is confidential, so every case below mirrors a real engagement with figures sanitized and identifying details changed. The structure, depth, and deliverables are exactly what you receive. A redacted sample workbook is available on request.

Value-Add · Acquisition01

“The Marlowe” — 128-Unit Multifamily

Garden-style community · Southeast US

Purchase price$21.4M · $167k/u
Going-in cap5.1%
Stab. yield on cost6.4%
5-yr LP IRR / EM17.4% / 2.1x
Avg cash-on-cash7.2%
The Situation

A sponsor under LOI with 21 days to firm up equity. The broker pro forma assumed a $250 premium on every renovated unit and 3% expense growth against a tax bill guaranteed to be reassessed at sale price.

The Work

Rebuilt the deal from the T-12 up: reassessed taxes at the county's actual millage, staged renovations across 30 months, and built a unit-by-unit ROI matrix that flagged 22 units where the premium didn't clear the renovation cost hurdle.

The Outcome

The LP committed on the revised numbers and the deal closed in 54 days. Trimming the 22 non-performing renovations cut roughly $410k of capex without moving stabilized NOI more than 1%.

Delivered

10-yr monthly DCF · renovation ROI matrix · agency debt sizing · sensitivity + downside case · LP tear sheet

Ground-Up · Development02

“Fulton Yards” — 42-Unit Mixed-Use

Infill development, 6k SF retail · Mountain West

Total dev cost$18.9M
Yield on cost (tr.)6.9%
Untrended YoC6.3%
Dev spread145 bps
Peak equity$6.1M
The Situation

A developer with entitled land, a GC budget, and two construction term sheets that looked identical on rate but weren't — different recourse burn-offs, different interest reserve mechanics.

The Work

Built the full monthly development model: S-curve draws, capitalized interest, construction-to-perm takeout, and a lease-up ramp tied to a micro-study of retail rents within a half-mile. Ran both term sheets through the same draw schedule to expose the true cost gap.

The Outcome

The 'cheaper' loan proved ~$180k more expensive once the reserve mechanics ran through the draws. The lender package built from the model sized at 62% LTC, and the equity waterfall closed at an 8% pref over a 20% promote.

Delivered

Development model with monthly draws · dual term-sheet comparison · retail rent micro-study · waterfall · lender package

Net Lease · Credit Tenant03

“Cedar Point Logistics” — 96k SF Industrial

Single-tenant NNN distribution · Midwest

Purchase price$12.6M
Cap rate6.8%
DSCR1.41x
Debt yield9.6%
WALT8.3 yrs
The Situation

A family office weighing a stabilized NNN industrial purchase against simply buying bonds — and needing to understand what happens in year nine when the lease expires.

The Work

Modeled the credit-tenant cash flows with three rollover scenarios: renewal at market, 12-month re-tenanting with TI/LC load, and a dark-value floor based on replacement cost and local vacancy. Layered a refinance analysis at year five against the hold.

The Outcome

The dark-value scenario reframed the negotiation — the buyer secured a larger reserve holdback and closed with conviction about the year-nine exposure instead of hoping about it. Refi-and-hold beat sale in every scenario above a 7.4% exit cap.

Delivered

Credit-tenant DCF · three rollover scenarios · dark-value floor analysis · refinance vs. sale memo

Hospitality · Reposition04

“The Beaumont” — 74-Key Boutique Hotel

Independent urban hotel repositioning · Southwest

Basis$9.8M · $132k/key
ADR (in / stab.)$148 → $189
RevPAR index87 → 104
Stabilized NOI$1.31M
Levered IRR19.8%
The Situation

An operator buying a tired independent hotel with a plan to renovate and reposition — and an equity partner skeptical that the post-renovation ADR was anything more than hope.

The Work

Built the hotel model on a full P&L basis: occupancy/ADR build-up by segment, departmental costs on POR/PAR logic, a 4% FF&E reserve, and a competitive-set penetration analysis showing where the RevPAR index gains actually come from. Ran branded vs. independent scenarios including franchise fee load.

The Outcome

The penetration math held: the equity partner funded, and the independent path beat the soft-brand conversion by roughly 90 bps of IRR after fees. The PIP budget got a 12% contingency the GC initially resisted — and used.

Delivered

Hotel P&L model · comp-set penetration analysis · brand vs. independent scenario · PIP budget review · investor memo

Model Audit · Rescue05

“Project Ledger” — 3-Property BTR Recap

Build-to-rent portfolio recapitalization · Sun Belt

Portfolio3 assets · 214 units
Errors found11 (3 material)
Waterfall error+190 bps to GP
LP IRR (corrected)15.9% → 13.6%
Raise statusSaved
The Situation

A sponsor mid-raise on a recapitalization, using an inherited model. An anchor LP's advisor asked one question about the promote math that the sponsor couldn't answer. The raise stalled.

The Work

Full forensic audit: precedent mapping of every output cell, hard-code hunt, and re-derivation of the waterfall by hand. Found a double-counted tax reassessment, a broken hurdle reference paying the GP promote 190 bps early, and a circular refinance assumption quietly inflating year-3 cash flow.

The Outcome

Corrected LP IRR moved from 15.9% to 13.6% — before the money came in, not after. The sponsor restructured the pref, re-presented with a clean model and an audit memo attached, and closed the raise without re-trading a single committed investor.

Delivered

Forensic audit memo with severity ratings · corrected model · rebuilt waterfall with per-tier audit tab · LP re-presentation exhibits

Have a live deal on the desk?

Send the basics through the intake form — a fixed quote and delivery date come back within one business day.

Submit a deal